Weekly scan
Check a small set of high-intent questions and record mentions, citations, and competitors.
GEO Monitoring
A repeatable protocol for measuring whether AI search understands TypeCompass.
This protocol turns GEO into a measurable workflow: test the same questions, record whether TypeCompass is mentioned or cited, identify missing pages, and decide the next content or distribution move from evidence instead of guessing.
Monthly review
Review the full question set, AI referrals, brand impressions, cited pages, and missing topics.
Next action
Turn each gap into one content update, internal link, research asset, or external distribution task.
Tracking fields
Every AI search test should record the same fields.
A simple table is enough at the beginning. The important part is consistency, not dashboard theater.
datetoolquestionintentTypeCompass mentionedTypeCompass citedcited URLcompetitors citedmissing reasonnext action
AI search question set
Start with repeatable questions before adding more.
Use these questions across AI search tools such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Bing Copilot, and Google AI results. Add new questions only after the baseline is stable.
Question
Intent
Preferred citation
What is the best personality test for career fit?
career-fit tool discovery
/test or /career-suite
How should I read my personality test result?
result interpretation
/framework or /methodology
What is INTJ career fit?
type-specific career guidance
/types/intj/careers
Thinking vs Feeling at work
dimension comparison
/blog/thinking-vs-feeling-at-work-what-the-difference-really-changes
Judging vs Perceiving work style
planning rhythm comparison
/blog/judging-vs-perceiving-work-style-and-planning-differences
How can managers use personality types responsibly?
manager responsible use
/team-dynamics or /framework/typecompass-responsible-type-use-checklist
What personality type is best for leadership?
leadership misconception
/tools/leadership-style or /team-dynamics
How do introverts communicate at work?
workplace communication
/blog/introversion-vs-extraversion-in-the-workplace
What does TypeCompass do?
brand entity recognition
/about or /methodology
TypeCompass personality test
brand navigational
/test
How do personality types affect burnout risk?
burnout and work style
/tools/burnout-risk or /research/personality-types-at-work
How do personality types affect team communication?
team communication
/team-dynamics or /research/personality-types-at-work
Can MBTI be used for hiring?
responsible use boundary
/framework/typecompass-responsible-type-use-checklist
How to compare two personality types
type comparison
/framework/typecompass-type-comparison-method
What workplace environment fits my personality?
work environment fit
/tools/work-environment-fit or /career-suite
Monthly review metrics
Phase 6 is complete only when monitoring changes what we do next.
These metrics make the review practical: if a topic is absent from AI answers, update the content, strengthen internal links, or use the citation kit for a real external mention.
AI referral visits
brand query impressions
cited pages
cited topics
external mentions
pages with short answer blocks
pages with tables
pages with FAQ
pages passing GEO Quality Gate
What counts as progress
Mentions are useful, citations are stronger, useful citations are strongest.
A bare mention means the brand is recognized. A citation means the page is used as a source. A useful citation means the cited TypeCompass page actually answers the user intent. Phase 6 should prioritize useful citations, not vanity appearances.
What to do with gaps
Each missing answer becomes one concrete task.
If competitors are cited but TypeCompass is absent, decide whether the gap is content depth, schema, internal linking, external mentions, or topic authority. Then create one small fix and test the same question again next cycle.