Clear reader question
Every article should answer a concrete question instead of existing only to target a keyword.
Editorial Policy
How TypeCompass keeps content useful and responsible.
TypeCompass articles are maintained to help readers interpret personality patterns without overusing labels. Our editorial standard favors practical context, clear limitations, and next steps that can be tested in real life.
Framework consistency
Advice should connect back to the TypeCompass approach: patterns, context, practical next steps, and responsible boundaries.
No absolute labels
We avoid language that treats a personality type as destiny, diagnosis, or a reason to limit someone's options.
Useful internal paths
Articles should link readers toward related guides, type pages, tools, or framework pages when those paths help the decision.
Review and update process
Plan
We start from reader questions, practical intent, and the role a page should play inside the broader TypeCompass library.
Review
We check for practical usefulness, responsible type interpretation, overclaiming, and internal links before publication.
Maintain
We update content when the framework, page structure, internal links, or reader needs change.
Corrections and feedback
If a page feels unclear, overly broad, outdated, or not aligned with responsible personality type use, readers can contact TypeCompass through the feedback page. We use that input to improve wording, links, and page structure.